Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Caroline Lampl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Lampl analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Caroline Lampl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 43.51% of points on his second serve, while Lampl has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 56.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lampl has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.01% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lampl has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 59.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 25), with Lampl winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Lampl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 20/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Lampl has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Lampl winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Lampl was at the W60 Pelham, 20-05-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Lampl have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Lampl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Lampl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.13 while Lampl has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lampl has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 40.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lampl has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Lampl
66
Rank
66
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
619
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
58% (119-87)
Career Total W/L
65% (42-23)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$424,110
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Caroline Lampl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) | 53% (21/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (23/37) | 48% (10/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 21% (4/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (26/40) | 42% (25/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Lampl
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Caroline Lampl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (30/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (278/265) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 105 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.46 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1108/1717) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (730/1108) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (265/609) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (92/227) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (814/1827) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Sofia Kenin
54%
(
67 of
124)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
12
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
33%
(
19 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
51%
(
63 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Gabriela Lee
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Caroline Lampl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Caroline Lampl
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Gamiz
Player
Caroline Lampl
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Margaux Komano
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Khromacheva
Player
Caroline Lampl
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Nadiya Kolb
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Cecilie Wiche
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Kubanova
Player
Caroline Lampl
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Vendula Valdmannova
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
16%
(
4 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
62%
(
41 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(4) 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Lampl
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Lampl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
